When it comes to choosing a smartwatch or fitness tracker, there are numerous options available in the market. Two of the most popular choices are the Pixel Watch 2 and Fitbit Charge 3. While both devices share some similarities, they have several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we’ll take a closer look at each device and help you decide which one is best suited for your needs.
Design and Display:
The Pixel Watch 2 has a sleek and modern design with a circular face and a touchscreen display. It features a stainless steel body and is available in two sizes (42mm and 46mm). The watch also has a built-in GPS, heart rate monitor, and water resistance up to 50 meters. On the other hand, the Fitbit Charge 3 has a more minimalistic design with a rectangular OLED display. It’s made of a lightweight material and is available in three different colors. Unlike the Pixel Watch 2, the Charge 3 doesn’t have a built-in GPS, but it does have a connected GPS feature that allows you to track runs, hikes, and other outdoor activities using your phone’s GPS.
Both devices offer a range of fitness features, including step tracking, distance tracking, calorie burn monitoring, and sleep tracking. However, the Pixel Watch 2 offers more advanced health and fitness features such as onboard music storage, guided breathing exercises, and Google Assistant integration. Additionally, the watch has a built-in ECG sensor that can detect irregular heart rhythms, providing users with valuable insights into their cardiovascular health. The Fitbit Charge 3, on the other hand, has a more limited set of fitness features compared to the Pixel Watch 2. It does offer automatic exercise tracking, goal-based workouts, and personalized recommendations based on your activity levels, but it lacks the more advanced health monitoring features found in the Pixel Watch 2.
In terms of smart features, the Pixel Watch 2 offers more comprehensive functionality than the Fitbit Charge 3. It supports Android Pay mobile payments, allowing users to make purchases without needing their wallet. The watch also has Google Assistant integration, enabling users to perform tasks such as setting reminders, sending messages, and controlling smart home devices. Additionally, the Pixel Watch 2 receives notifications from all apps, not just native ones like the Charge 3. The Fitbit Charge 3, while still offering some smart features, has a more limited selection. It can receive notifications from select apps, control music playback, and even respond to texts and calls through voice commands. However, its lack of a built-in speaker means that audio feedback is limited to simple beeps and vibrations.
Pricing and Battery Life:
The Pixel Watch 2 starts at $399 for the smaller 42mm size and goes up to $449 for the larger 46mm version. The Fitbit Charge 3, on the other hand, retails for $149.95. When it comes to battery life, the Pixel Watch 2 lasts around 24 hours on a single charge, while the Fitbit Charge 3 boasts an impressive seven days of battery life.
Choosing between the Pixel Watch 2 and Fitbit Charge 3 ultimately depends on what you value most in a wearable device. If you prioritize advanced health and fitness features, along with comprehensive smart capabilities, then the Pixel Watch 2 may be the better choice. Its built-in ECG sensor, guided breathing exercises, and Google Assistant integration make it an excellent option for those looking to monitor their health and stay connected. However, if you’re looking for a more affordable, straightforward fitness tracker with long battery life, the Fitbit Charge 3 might be the way to go. Its simplicity, water resistance, and connected GPS features make it an ideal choice for anyone who wants to track their daily activity without breaking the bank.